000			01804cam a2200301 4500500
005			20250121123811.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aVelt, Johanna _eauthor
245	0	0	_aIs enactment an elaborable residue?
260			_c2023.
500			_a95
520			_aBased on clinical vignettes and a review of the literature, I show that enactment has its origins in countertransference (Heimann), especially basic countertransference (Parat), and the analyst’s role responsiveness (Sandler) or the analyst’s personality (Ferenczi, Rank). Enactment may thus be considered as a new royal road to the unconscious and it is the analyst’s capacity for reverie (Bion) that facilitates the transition from an infra-representational register to a representational register, particularly access to dreams. Enactment can be seen as a repetition of the traumatic in the analytic field, and the analyst can help the patient to elaborate it. Borderline modes of functioning that encourage acting out should lead us to treat them as clinical material that is repeated before being recalled. Enactment, in my opinion, is a residue of the analytic couple that can be elaborated and open up new research perspectives.
690			_acountertransference
690			_areverie
690			_aenactment
690			_atraumatic
690			_aborderline states
690			_abasic transference
690			_acountertransference
690			_areverie
690			_aenactment
690			_atraumatic
690			_aborderline states
690			_abasic transference
786	0		_nRevue française de psychanalyse | 87 | 3 | 2023-04-06 | p. 601-612 | 0035-2942
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-psychanalyse-2023-3-page-601?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c561260 _d561260