000			01590cam a2200241 4500500
005			20250112034836.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aRevil, Hélèna _eauthor
245	0	0	_aThe Computerization of the Non Take-Up (NTU) of Health Benefits in France
260			_c2015.
500			_a100
520			_aWe argue that the instruments of public action can contribute to public issues emerging and being placed among the concerns of institutional actors. In this article, our aim is to understand the role and the limits of an IT tool in the administrative agenda setting of an issue such as the one of non take-up (NTU) of benefits. Our hypothesis is that although it can formulate specific representations of this poorly understood area and can produce overall benefits, IT alone cannot be responsible for the agenda setting of NTU. This matter still proves to be a contentious issue and it is bound up with contradictory institutional dilemmas. Nor can it unilaterally transform the methods of action of social institutions with regard to NTU limitations and, in a more general sense, to the everyday carrying out of their mandate with respect to the policy’s beneficiaries.
690			_ahealth system
690			_aagenda setting
690			_anon take-up
690			_achange
690			_alimits
690			_aIT
690			_afree health insurance coverage
786	0		_nGouvernement et action publique | 4 | 2 | 2015-07-01 | p. 57-80 | 2260-0965
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-gouvernement-et-action-publique-2015-2-page-57?lang=en
999			_c169871 _d169871