18

Introduction: Tele-expertise in dermatology represents an opportunity to change medical practice in response to the need for cost savings in the health sector. The aim of this study was to evaluate the medical activities of the pilot phase of the tele-expertise project in Togo. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted in October 2020 on the 20 sites of the pilot phase. This evaluation consisted of a literature review and analysis of data posted on the tele-expertise platform. Results: A total of 738 (10.8%) of the 6810 dermatological consultations were posted on the tele-expertise platform. Of the 738 cases, the dermatologist’s expertise did not allow a diagnosis to be made in 119 cases (16.1%). This expertise confirmed the single clinical hypothesis proposed by the health worker in 275 cases (37.3%) and allowed a diagnosis to be made among several clinical hypotheses in 30 cases (4.1%). On the contrary, the dermatologist’s diagnosis was not included in the health worker’s hypotheses in 201 cases (27.2%), and no clinical hypothesis was formulated in 113 cases (15.3%). The concordance between the clinical hypothesis proposed by the health worker and the diagnosis of the dermatologist was 48.8%. Regarding the acceptability of the tele-expertise, only one refusal was recorded. All patients were very satisfied with this practice. Conclusions: The results show the feasibility and acceptability of tele-expertise by health care personnel and patients. The diagnostic concordance of 48.8% shows the relative efficiency of task delegation.