Image de Google Jackets
Vue normale Vue MARC vue ISBD

Should sociology be afraid of methodological individualism? A critical discussion of Mark Granovetter’s Society and Economy: Framework and Principles

Par : Type de matériel : TexteTexteLangue : français Détails de publication : 2018. Sujet(s) : Ressources en ligne : Abrégé : This review presents Mark Granovetter’s most recent book, which aims to lay out the theoretical and conceptual foundations of the new economic sociology—a field that has been strongly influenced by this eminent sociologist. This provides the opportunity to return to some of his previous work. As part of our critical discussion of the book, we express our perplexity about the sudden introduction of the notion of the “pragmatic actor” in the final two chapters. Never clearly defined, this figure closely resembles the actor of methodological individualism, an analytic position that Granovetter firmly rejects and avoids in the first section. This conceptual inconsistency is all the more perplexing when seen in light of another, which, equally strange, can be observed in the most recent book by Neil Fligstein and Doug McAdam, A Theory of Fields. Having presented actors whom they describe as competent and strategic, the authors then deny them any real autonomy or ability to evaluate or measure their commitment to and in collective action. The review concludes by questioning the broader significance of such conceptual slippages, and proposes the hypothesis that they are the sign of sociology’s problematic position within the broader field of the social sciences.
Tags de cette bibliothèque : Pas de tags pour ce titre. Connectez-vous pour ajouter des tags.
Evaluations
    Classement moyen : 0.0 (0 votes)
Nous n'avons pas d'exemplaire de ce document

43

This review presents Mark Granovetter’s most recent book, which aims to lay out the theoretical and conceptual foundations of the new economic sociology—a field that has been strongly influenced by this eminent sociologist. This provides the opportunity to return to some of his previous work. As part of our critical discussion of the book, we express our perplexity about the sudden introduction of the notion of the “pragmatic actor” in the final two chapters. Never clearly defined, this figure closely resembles the actor of methodological individualism, an analytic position that Granovetter firmly rejects and avoids in the first section. This conceptual inconsistency is all the more perplexing when seen in light of another, which, equally strange, can be observed in the most recent book by Neil Fligstein and Doug McAdam, A Theory of Fields. Having presented actors whom they describe as competent and strategic, the authors then deny them any real autonomy or ability to evaluate or measure their commitment to and in collective action. The review concludes by questioning the broader significance of such conceptual slippages, and proposes the hypothesis that they are the sign of sociology’s problematic position within the broader field of the social sciences.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025