Skin cancer screening in organ transplant centres in the United Kingdom: a national survey (notice n° 602802)
[ vue normale ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02277cam a2200253 4500500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250121154621.0 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | fre |
| 042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE | |
| Authentication code | dc |
| 100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Cordaro, Andrea |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Skin cancer screening in organ transplant centres in the United Kingdom: a national survey |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2020.<br/> |
| 500 ## - GENERAL NOTE | |
| General note | 80 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Background: Organ transplant recipients (OTRs) have up to 500-fold increased risk of keratinocyte skin cancer (KSC). International guidelines recommend at least annual skin cancer screening for OTRs. Objectives: To explore the current skin cancer surveillance practice in UK transplant centres across all solid organs and the barriers to surveillance. Materials and Methods: An online survey was sent to all 59 transplant centres in the UK specialising in kidney (n = 24), pancreas (n = 10), heart and/or lung (n = 13), liver (n = 8) and intestine (n = 4) transplants. Results: Fifty-one (86%) transplant centres responded. Twenty-eight (55%) centres provided skin cancer surveillance post-transplantation, of which 18 (64%) had a non-skin cancer specialist providing screening. Only 21 (41%) units performed a full skin examination. Eight units (29%) screened at least bi-annually in the first five years post-transplantation. Of the 23 (45%) centres that did not provide skin cancer surveillance, limitations included: reliance on patient-reported lesions (48%), lack of skin surveillance training (30%), lack of funding (48%), not a requirement in all patients (17%) and time restraints in the clinic (30%). Conclusion: In the UK, many transplant units do not provide skin surveillance. Collaboration between skin cancer and transplant specialists would improve surveillance rates and reduce morbidity and mortality. |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | transplant |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | oncology |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | skin cancer |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | immunosuppression |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Dobbs, Thomas D. |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Gibson, John AG. |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Whitaker, Sairan |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 10 - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Whitaker, Iain S. |
| Relator term | author |
| 786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY | |
| Note | European Journal of Dermatology | 30 | 4 | 2020-07-01 | p. 372-376 | 1167-1122 |
| 856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/revue-european-journal-of-dermatology-2020-4-page-372?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/revue-european-journal-of-dermatology-2020-4-page-372?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080</a> |
Pas d'exemplaire disponible.
Réseaux sociaux