The stakes and controversies of intersex activist participation in the Chicago Consensus (2005) (notice n° 588210)

détails MARC
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02484cam a2200277 4500500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250121143905.0
041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title fre
042 ## - AUTHENTICATION CODE
Authentication code dc
100 10 - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Aegerter, Audrey
Relator term author
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title The stakes and controversies of intersex activist participation in the Chicago Consensus (2005)
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2023.<br/>
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note 63
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Introduction: For the first time, two intersex activists were invited to participate in an international medical conference in Chicago in 2005. As a result of this conference, recommendations for the medical management of intersex patients were updated. In addition, a new terminology has been adopted to refer to intersex people, namely disorders of sex development. Purpose of research: This qualitative research aims to understand the implication of patient expertise in the development of new models of care. The article takes as a case study a controversy between the Intersex Society of North America (ISNA) and the Organisation internationale des intersexes (OII), during the 2000’s. Results: The analysis of the controversy between ISNA and OII reveals that the participation of patients in the Chicago conference raises the epistemic injustice. That is, the knowledge of those affected is not given the same credibility as that of other participants. In addition, intersex people do not have access to the same information as health professionals, especially since the medical protocols used to recommend secrecy. It also reveals that the strategies adopted by some organizations may prove to be a failure or safeguard positions contrary to the interests of the people concerned. This paper calls for reflection on the strategies implemented, here in the dialogue with the medical profession. Conclusions: This research contributes more widely to the scientific debates on the epistemological and political stakes of a participation of the concerned persons in the development of healthcare policies.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Disorders of sex development
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Intersexe
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Medical expertise
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Epistemic injustice
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Lay expertise
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Disorders of sex development
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Intersexe
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Medical expertise
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Epistemic injustice
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element Lay expertise
786 0# - DATA SOURCE ENTRY
Note Santé Publique | 34 | HS2 | 2023-05-07 | p. 59-67 | 0995-3914
856 41 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://shs.cairn.info/journal-sante-publique-2022-HS2-page-59?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080">https://shs.cairn.info/journal-sante-publique-2022-HS2-page-59?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080</a>

Pas d'exemplaire disponible.

PLUDOC

PLUDOC est la plateforme unique et centralisée de gestion des bibliothèques physiques et numériques de Guinée administré par le CEDUST. Elle est la plus grande base de données de ressources documentaires pour les Étudiants, Enseignants chercheurs et Chercheurs de Guinée.

Adresse

627 919 101/664 919 101

25 boulevard du commerce
Kaloum, Conakry, Guinée

Réseaux sociaux

Powered by Netsen Group @ 2025